What We Do

Together, We Heal

What We Do

Our Vision, Mission & Values

Our Vision

To make PACER the voice of patients in clinical research.

Our Mission

To create expert patients who can effectively represent the patient voice in the clinical research process.

Our Core Values

• Patient Centricity
• Collaboration
• Communication

• Engagement
• Empowerment
• Integrity

What We Do

Education & Training

Workshops for patients, caregivers, survivors & PAG leaders

Building Patient Advocates

Capacity-building for PAGs to influence policy and research

Creative Awareness

Nukkad natak, survivor art, school & community engagement

Policy & Advocacy

Consultations with regulators, ethics committees & research institutions, with PAGs as equal stakeholders

Publications & Resources

Toolkits, patient guides, advocacy materials for PAGs & families

Education & Training

Workshops for patients, caregivers, survivors & PAG leaders

Building Patient Advocates

Capacity-building for PAGs to influence policy and research

Creative Awareness

Nukkad natak, survivor art, school & community engagement

Policy & Advocacy

Consultations with regulators, ethics committees & research institutions, with PAGs as equal stakeholders

Publications & Resources

Toolkits, patient guides, advocacy materials for PAGs & families

Who We Are

CanKids…KidsCan

India's only national NGO working across the entire spectrum of childhood cancer care, providing comprehensive support from diagnosis to survivorship.

National Coverage

APAR Health

A health think-tank and implementation partner working to improve research, policy, and advocacy in India through evidence-based solutions.

Policy & Research

Patient Advocates & PAGs

Survivors, caregivers, and advocacy groups who co-create PACER's agenda and drive its implementation with lived experience and passion.

Community Driven

Clinical Research Workshops

A comprehensive series of workshops focused on clinical research awareness, ethics, and patient advocacy in healthcare

Workshop Series Overview

Awareness Impact

Defining key research roles.

Research Ethics

Improving ethics & privacy.

Barrier Reduction

Finding gains & hurdles.

Our Impact

500

Research Studies

10,000

Patients Served

50

Medical Centers

25

Year of Excellence

Our Impact

500

Research Studies

10,000

Patients Served

50

Medical Centers

25

Year of Excellence

From Patient Navigator to Patient Advocate – Improving Healthcare outcomes through evidence based advocacy research

Key Components Discussed

- Engagement of PAGs in drug development phases
- How PAGs can help patients participate Research and hold hand for patients rights in research.

Good Clinical Practice & Research Ethics

Key Components Discussed

- How Patient Advocate Groups (PAGs) can Uphold the ethical principles and avoid conflicts of interest and bias.

Awareness on Clinical Research

Key Components Discussed

- What is clinical research
- Informed consents
- Ethical, legal & regulatory framework
- Importance of Clinical research for patient advocates

Workshop Series Overview

Workshops Conducted
0
Months Duration
0
Cities Covered
0

This comprehensive workshop series provided essential knowledge and skills for patient advocates, covering clinical research fundamentals, ethical practices, regulatory frameworks, and patient-centric approaches to improve healthcare outcomes.

Workshop Statistics

Workshop 1: Impact Analysis of Clinical Research Awareness

Awareness on Clinical Research

Key Components Discussed

- What is clinical research
- Informed consents
- Ethical, legal & regulatory framework
- Importance of Clinical research for patient advocates

  • PACER awareness increased: 91.7% → 97.9%
  • ICF understanding improved significantly: 81.3% → 95.8% (p = 0.039)
  • Study completion awareness rose: 62.5% → 85.4% (p = 0.013)
  • PI role clarity improved: 83.3% → 95.8% (p = 0.031)
  • Slight drop in clinical research awareness: 97.9% → 93.8%

🗒 Note:

★ = Statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05)

A total of 20 PAGs represented by 48 participants, active in areas of pediatric cancer, breast cancer, multiple myeloma, type I diabetes, spinal muscular atrophy, sickle cell disease, and inflammatory bowel diseases, participated. Among 48 participants 30 successfully completed the online course (multiple-choice question evaluation score cut-off >70%), attaining an average score of 23.9 ± 2.1 out of 30. Overall, 48 participants attended workshop 1 and 45 workshop 2, with 140 participants joining the focus group discussion (FGD). An overall improvement of 9.4% (2 = 46.173; p < 0.001) for workshop 1 and 8.2% (2 = 25.412; p < 0.001) for workshop 2 was seen in knowledge gain about clinical research. The FGD raised issues such as misleading information from research teams, unethical recruitment, incomprehensible information sheets, and limited trial-related knowledge fostering fear of participation in clinical research.

Awareness on Clinical Reaserach

Education

Awareness On Clinical Research

Learn essential skills for effective patient advocacy and healthcare navigation.

Free

Registration
 
55%
Scroll to Top